Table 3

Summary of Studies on Supplemental Prepartum Energy Intake on Calving Difficulty, Subsequent Reproductive Performance and Calf Growth (Selk, 2000)

Researcher

Supplementationa

Summary of Effects

 Christenson et al., 1967

HE vs. LE for 140 d Prepartum 

HE increased birth wt.,dystocia, milk & estrus activity

Dunn et al. 1969

ME vs LE for 120 d prepartum

ME increased birth wt. 
and dystocia

Bellows et al. 1972

HE VS LE for 82 d prepartum

HE increased birth wt but 
had no effect on dystocia 
or weaning wt.

Laster & Gregory, 1973

HE vs ME vs LE for 90 d prepartum

HE increased birth wt 
but had no effect on dystocia

Laster, 1974

HE vs ME vs LE for 90 d prepartum

HE increased birth wt. 
but had no effect on dystocia

Corah et al. 1975

ME vs LE for 100 d prepartum

ME increased birth wt., 
estrus activity, calf vigor 
and weaning wt. but 
had no effect on dystocia

Bellows and Short, 1978

HE vs LE for 90 d prepartum

 HE increased birth wt., 
estrus activity, pregnancy 
rate and decreased 
post partum interval but 
had no effect on dystocia

Anderson, et al. 1981

HE vs LE for 90 d prepartum

HE had no effect on 
birth wt., milk or 
weaning wt.

Houghton et al., 1986

ME vs. LE for 100 d prepartum

ME increased birth wt. & weaning wt. 
but had no effect on 
dystocia

  aHE = high energy (over 100% NRC or National Research Council's recommended dietary need); ME = moderate energy (approximately 100% NRC); LE = low energy (under 100% NRC)