Table 3
Summary of Studies on Supplemental Prepartum Energy Intake on Calving Difficulty, Subsequent Reproductive Performance and Calf Growth (Selk, 2000)
|
Researcher |
Supplementationa |
Summary of Effects |
|
Christenson et al., 1967 |
HE vs. LE for 140 d Prepartum |
HE increased birth wt.,dystocia,
milk & estrus activity |
|
Dunn et al. 1969 |
ME vs LE for 120 d prepartum |
ME increased birth wt. |
|
Bellows et al. 1972 |
HE VS LE for 82 d prepartum |
HE increased birth wt but |
|
Laster & Gregory, 1973 |
HE vs ME vs LE for 90 d prepartum |
HE increased birth wt |
|
Laster, 1974 |
HE vs ME vs LE for 90 d prepartum |
HE increased birth wt. |
|
Corah et al. 1975 |
ME vs LE for 100 d prepartum |
ME increased birth wt., |
|
Bellows and Short, 1978 |
HE vs LE for 90 d prepartum |
HE increased birth wt., |
|
Anderson, et al. 1981 |
HE vs LE for 90 d prepartum |
HE had no effect on |
|
Houghton et al., 1986 |
ME vs. LE for 100 d prepartum |
ME increased birth wt. &
weaning wt. |
aHE = high energy (over 100% NRC or National Research Council's recommended dietary need); ME = moderate energy (approximately 100% NRC); LE = low energy (under 100% NRC)