|
>
Department >
Home >
Beef
>
Beef/Cattle >
General
Beef/Cattle Extension Program
Grasshoppers and Mormon Crickets Outlook and Management
Options
By Sue Blodgett, Extension Entomologist,
Montana State University
"Judging
by the Grasshopper Hazard Map for Montana, this
year will be an important one for managing grasshoppers
in rangeland and cropland..." |
2004 - Grasshoppers and Mormon crickets are native
components of the rangeland ecosystem and are voracious
feeders, consuming approximately one-half of their body
weight in green forage per day. There are about 12 grasshopper
species (called the Dirty Dozen) that are responsible
for damage to rangelands. Their populations can reach
outbreak levels and cause serious economic losses, especially
when accompanied by a drought.
Judging by the Grasshopper Hazard Map for Montana,
this year will be an important one for managing grasshoppers
in rangeland and cropland around the state. We are seeing
grasshopper and Mormon cricket infestations about three
weeks earlier than usual this year. The Insect Diagnostic
Lab has received reports of grasshopper and Mormon Cricket
hatch this year.
Fifteen to 20 grasshopper nymphs per square yard in
rangeland or pastures is considered the economic threshold.
This number is considered to equate to eight to 10 adults.
However, the economic threshold can be modified by weather
conditions. If moisture is adequate regrowth of the
consumed or destroyed rangeland vegetation may offset
the damage. Estimates of daily dry matter intake for
grasshoppers range from 30 to 250 percent of body weight
compared to 1.5 to 2.5 percent for beef cattle. A 1250
pound cow would consume 19 to 31 pounds of herbage each
day. The same amount of herbage could be consumed by
80 - 104 pounds of grasshoppers in a single day.
Management:
The RAATs program developed at the University of Wyoming
is an economical method of treating rangeland for grasshoppers
in which both the insecticide rate of insecticide and
acreage treated is reduced by alternating untreated
and treated swaths. There are savings both in the acreage
treated and in the amount of product used.
Pesticides in treated swaths kill grasshoppers directly
and also provide control as hoppers move from treated
to untreated swaths. Predators and parasites are preserved
in untreated swaths so that they can suppress grasshopper
populations. Recent insecticide trials in Wyoming indicate
that reduced rates of carbaryl (Sevin) both in the amount
of pesticide and area treated of about 50 percent only
reduced control from 85 to 79 percent. This reduction
in pesticide would reduce control costs by 60 percent
This IPM approach can reduce the cost of control the
amount of insecticide used.
RAATs grasshopper control obtained in Wyoming studies
found 80-95 percent of a standard, high chemical rate,
blanket treatment with 50% cost reduction per acre.
This approach is a win-win for rangeland managers by
reducing costs, reducing pesticide use and resulting
in effective control. A brochure on using this method
is available on the web http://www.sdvc.uwyo.edu/grasshopper/
. The RAATS chemical options include carbaryl (Sevin
XLR), an insect growth regulator called Diflubenzuron
(Dimilin 2L) and malathion. Dimilin interferes with
the hopper's ability to molt and must be applied to
2nd 3rd stage grasshoppers. It has been found to very
effective but signs of control may take several days
(until hoppers molt). It is not effective once grasshopper
population has reached adult stage.
Insecticide Options
Rangeland grasshopper control options are covered in
detail in the High Plains IPM Guide located on the web
at http://highplainsipm.org. Both carbaryl (several
formulations of Sevin available) and malathion are available
for later season applications, once grasshoppers have
reached the adult stage. However, their effectiveness
is directly related to residual activity of the product
because of the movement and re-infestation potential
of adult grasshoppers (residual: carbaryl, 14 days;
malathion, 1 day).
Rotational Grazing (from Jerry Onsager):
A long-term strategy to reduce frequency and intensity
of grasshopper outbreaks was developed by Dr. Jerry
Onsager, USDA, ARS, retired. He examined twice-over
rotational grazing compared with traditional season-
long grazing for grasshopper outbreak control. Some
of his results include:
| Rotational Grazing |
Season-long Grazing |
| No difference in grasshopper species |
| Nymphs develop slower |
Nymphs develop more rapidly |
| Survival rates by stage were lower, less variable |
Survival rates higher |
| Fewer adults produced |
More adults produced - 3.3 more hoppers than rotational
grazing |
| Adults appeared later in season |
Adults appeared earlier in season - more time
for egg lay |
| Forage consumption 10-23% (compared with cattle) |
Forage consumption 91-168% (compared with cattle) |
| Outbreak hopper species remained low |
3 hopper species contributed to outbreak |
Large-Scale Grasshopper Spray Programs USDA APHIS has
funds to match large-scale grasshopper treatment. Federal
rangeland eligible for cooperative grasshopper suppression
treatments from APHIS includes: rangeland blocks of
more than 10,000 acres that would protect forage as
well as prevent re infestation if treated; incipient
populations, or hot spots of grasshoppers, that, if
treated, would prevent a wider spread of outbreaks;
and federal or trust land borders that, if treated,
would prevent the movement of economically threatening
populations of grasshoppers to adjacent private agricultural
lands. Cost sharing includes 100% on federal lands,
50% on state lands and 33% on private lands with the
remainder paid for by the landowner.
In many years, federal funds put aside for this type
of program are spent or allocated in states to the south
before the need for rangeland grasshopper treatment
is reached in Montana. However, this year, Gary Adams,
Director, USDA, APHIS Montana is putting together programs
early so that Montana ranchers and landowners can take
advantage of federal matching funds.
Gary Adams can be contacted at: 406- 449-5210 or Gary.D.Adams@usda.gov
Beef:
Questions & Answers is a joint project between
MSU Extension and the Montana Beef Council. This column
informs producers about current consumer education,
promotion and research projects funded through the
$1 per head checkoff. For more information, contact
the Montana Beef Council at (406) 442-5111 or at beefcncl@mt.net
|