|
> Skeen
Institute
Montana Sustainable Rangeland Livestock
Task Force (MSRLTF)
Areas of Emphasis
Invasive
species – Invasive plants, such as leafy
spurge and spotted knapweed, infest
millions of acres of land in 26 northern states, decrease
livestock forage, deplete wildlife habitat, increase
soil erosion, reduce biological diversity, and cost
landowners and the general public millions of dollars
each year. Controlled livestock grazing can be used
as a landscape manipulation tool to enhance ecological
systems and may provide the most economically and environmentally
sound alternative to chemical control of the encroachment
of noxious, non-native plants, and for vegetative control
to provide fire breaks in the urban/rural interface,
to reduce forage competition for timber production,
to control crop insect pests, and to add value to crop
residue.
Wildlife
habitat – Public and private rangelands
in the western United States provide important habitat
for both wildlife and livestock. Relationships between
wildlife and livestock, and between wildlife and livestock
enterprises, can be competitive, complementary or neutral,
depending upon site-specific conditions. Wildlife habitat,
and hence wildlife, should benefit from the removal
of leafy spurge and other noxious weeds by grazing by
enhancing soil, water, nutrient, and sunlight availability
for native grasses and promoting more balanced plant
diversity. Management strategies that promote a positive
relationship between wildlife and livestock industries
will work to create a beneficial link between the two
industries that can be used to resolve conflicts where
livestock and wildlife cohabit.
Riparian
habitat – Riparian areas make up only
a small portion of the landscape, however they produce
a disproportionate amount of forage on rangelands and
often receive a disproportionate amount of use. The
effects of grazing on vegetation, soils, and water quality
are dictated by when and how long grazing occurs, how
often it occurs, and how much vegetation is removed
(i.e., timing, frequency, and severity) and the key
to managing these variables is the ability to manipulate
where animals graze and rest. Use of selective culling
of individual cows that over-utilize riparian habitat,
a strategy based upon the largely untested hypothesis
that individual animals differ in their habitat use
preferences, may diminish the impacts of grazing on
riparian areas. Greater riparian habitat use by individual
cows may, however, be explained by the alternative hypothesis
that social competition may force subordinate individuals
onto upland sites. Knowledge of social dynamics within
a herd can be used to manage riparian habitat more effectively
and reduce the effects of streambank trampling.
|
Copyright
© 2001. Montana State University. All Rights
Reserved. Revised
March 12, 2006
.
|
|